Tuesday, 26 April 2011
Sisyphus
December 6, 2009 - the conversation
It started as an argument. You said I don’t value you like I value them. You were wrong and I was upset that you hadn’t given me the credit I felt I deserve. It came down to my having to tell you what I didn’t want to tell you, what I haven’t wanted you to know for three years. And then I told you.
And your reaction was less than what I expected it to be. You weren’t upset, though not reciprocal. You in point of fact told me that you aren’t worth loving at all; that I should love someone who has more money, a car, a “good” job. You said you didn’t have a future, but that you wanted me to be happy with someone. I was so frustrated. Crying from both eyes, as you noticed.
You discouraged me, then kissed me twice, sweetly. Without precedent, and considering the subject matter, I’m now more confused than ever. It’s difficult to explain the relationship to anyone who doesn’t know us both, and more so to anyone who does. They believe firmly that we’ve been beyond that line, that we’ve been “involved” and just never told anyone. That any of the so-called drama between us is of my making and I’m being sensitive.
I’m stuck in this place between what you did and did not say, what you did and did not do, where we have and have not been together. These pieces haphazardly thrown together with your speaking in euphemism and incomplete sentences. Bundles of nerves all triggered and forced to numb. I suppose I’m happy to have finally told you, but your radio silence is a regret. I’d hoped, however naively, that there would be a fundamental change in our relationship that would ultimately keep it exactly the same, if less murky.
But you’re quiet, on the other end of a perhaps unreceived text message. It’s convenient. And tricky. And painful. But there is room for plausible deniability, which is useful.